Windows 2008 r2 terminal services vs citrix

Application Publishing Application publishing refers to granting users access to applications. Citrix has always had a mechanism to specify which users get which application as well as which server can run the application.

Windows Server R1 has no such mechanism. In Windows Server R1, once you published an application, the application was available to everyone. Also, it was assumed the application was available on every server — which means you, the administrator, had to ensure every server had every application installed. RDS does have some application publishing improvements, but these improvements are more like filters. Every application is still available to every user, but you can use these filters to filter out what the end user sees.

This is not a security mechanism as users still have access to the hidden applications. Citrix has supported multiple monitors for some time. This means when you maximize an application, the application will fill up all available monitors. There are some restrictions on monitor placement and size as well. There are no monitor placement or resolution restrictions in RDS. This means no Windows XP or Vista support. I have seen a hack to get RDC 7. Unfortunately, RDS does not have this capability.

There are 3rd party solutions for this though. To set up and maintain the even the most basic environments takes quite a bit of planning and infrastructure. Microsoft claims RDS is aimed at low complexity environments. But, RDS is actually pretty complex to set up and maintain. Citrix still reigns supreme on management and Enterprise features. Hurdles If you decide to give pure Windows Server Remote Desktop Services a shot in your environment, there are a few hurdles you need to know about:.

I think any environment can benefit from the Citrix feature set, but it is up to each organization to cost justify the expenditure. So, can you get away with just RDS? Hurdles If you decide to give pure Windows Server Remote Desktop Services a shot in your environment, there are a few hurdles you need to know about: Windows R2 is 64 bit only — that means: Possible hardware upgrades or purchases All applications will need to run in a 64 bit environment A lot of features require Windows 7.

Possible hardware purchases to meet infrastructure needs. Rate this:. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Bart permalink. Heath permalink. Ola permalink. Jhon permalink. Len Inkster permalink. Alex permalink. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public. Name required. Xcentric is comprised of technology professionals who are passionate about technology and serving people.

We specifically serve the CPA community and speak to the issues they face day in and day out. Does that mean we only work with CPAs? This blog provides information on all things technology, business, or as it relates to CPAs. Follow Following. Sign me up. Already have a WordPress. Log in now. Viewed 1k times. Improve this question. MatBanik MatBanik 3 3 gold badges 7 7 silver badges 27 27 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Disclosure: I work with Citrix a lot, so I am biased Citrix XenApp won't help improve performance of the applications as such - i.

Improve this answer. Dan Dan This is perfect case where client should move forward because of the protocol only Disclosure: I do not work for Citrix, I consolut for both technologies. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.